Massimo Giunta vs Hazem Naow Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Sep at 11:46 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Giunta vs H. Naow

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SYR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Giunta 1 - 0 Naow
They have played 2 sets in total, with Massimo Giunta winning 2 and Hazem Naow winning 0. The last match between Massimo Giunta and Hazem Naow was at the M15 Monastir, 26-09-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Massimo Giunta getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Giunta | 1 |
| Naow | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Monastir(09-26-25)
M. Giunta vs H. Naow H2H Profile
M. Giunta vs H. Naow Match Preview:
- In recent performances, Hazem Naow has secured 38.33% of points on his second serve, whereas Massimo Giunta has achieved 45.00%. Could this indicate a service advantage for Massimo?
- Regarding return game stats, Hazem Naow has won 57.29% of his opponent’s second serve points, outperforming Massimo Giunta, who has taken 43.96%. This might give Hazem an edge in returning services.
- When facing first serves, Hazem Naow has achieved a 33.85% win rate compared to Massimo Giunta's 27.94%. Will this increase Hazem's chances of breaking Massimo’s serve?
- Under pressure, Massimo Giunta has saved 54.86% of breakpoints, slightly surpassing Hazem Naow's 50.00%. Can Massimo maintain composure better under pressure?
- Hazem Naow has won 52.63% of his matches in the last year, compared to Massimo Giunta's 50.00%. Could Hazem's winning record give him the confidence edge?
- Hazem Naow excels on Hard courts with a 69% career win rate, while Massimo Giunta performs best on Grass with 67%. Which surface will this match be played on?
- In the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, Hazem has achieved a 66.67% match win rate over the past year, outperforming Massimo's 51.35%. Could this indicate Hazem's dominance at this level?
- Hazem Naow has faced opponents with an average rank of 310.84, while Massimo's opponents have had an average rank of 508.15. Does this suggest Hazem has gained experience against tougher competitors?
- In deciding sets, Massimo Giunta edges out slightly with a 42% win rate compared to Hazem Naow's 40%. Does this give Massimo a marginal advantage in tight matches?
Editorial Prediction (September 26, 2025, UTC):
Both players exhibit strengths that could influence the outcome of their upcoming match. Massimo Giunta showcases superior second serve performance and breakpoint saving abilities, often crucial in tight matches.
However, Hazem Naow holds a significant advantage in return games, especially against second serves, and has faced tougher opponents historically, possibly preparing him better for challenging encounters.
Given Hazem Naow’s superior match win rate at this level and his stronger return stats, he is slightly favored to win this encounter, provided he can capitalize on his returning prowess and maintain composure under pressure.
Massimo Giunta vs Hazem Naow Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Giunta vs H. Naow H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:19:5 | Average Match Time | 1:19:5 |
| 68% (27/40) | 1st Serve % | 46% (26/56) |
| 81% (22/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (16/26) |
| 54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (10/30) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (30/56) | Return Points Win % | 28% (11/40) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Giunta Recent Matches Played
H. Naow Recent Matches Played

M. Giunta vs H. Naow Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.10% (104/75) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.31% (176/102) |
| 55.67% (226/180) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.30% (388/245) |
| 52.73% (2045/1833) | Games Win/Loss | 54.39% (3182/2668) |
| 62.14% (64/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 68.42% (78/36) |
| 53.73% (36/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.94% (62/45) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.16% (36/21) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 734 | Aces Total | 409 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 393 | Total Double Faults | 748 |
| 1:40:44 | Average Match Time | 1:23:18 |
| 457.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 414.8 |
| 59% (6478/10952) | 1st Serve % | 67% (10190/15241) |
| 70% (4504/6478) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6599/10190) |
| 49% (2209/4474) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2389/5051) |
| 43% (462/1078) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (851/1865) |
| 40% (4342/10868) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6841/15565) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 34.78% (8/15) | Challenger W/L | 50.85% (30/29) |
| 61.54% (96/60) | Futures W/L | 67.13% (145/71) |
| 58% (100/173) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (172/273) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 44% (22/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (32/62) |
| 58% (32/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (40/78) |
| 82% (108/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (170/152) |
| 18% (108/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (170/18) |
| 19% (70/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (108/24) |